Tag Archives: Electromagnetic

EMC Compliance 2015

I just want to take a moment to thank you for your interest and your business in 2014, and wish you well in the coming year.

cropped-sunrise-over-earth_2.jpg2014 was my first year trying in earnest to get out there and market the Sunrise business, and I really appreciate the gracious way I was received by many of you as I visited and shared advice, flyers, business cards, and most recently blogs.

As you know, I specialize in EMC oriented product design and layout reviews, product prescreen, and trouble shooting EMC issues in electronic products. I’m grateful for the opportunities I had to help customers in 2014, and I hope more customers will consider including me as part of their product design cycle in 2015.

In addition to EMC specific product review and testing, I’m glad to have been of service in test and certification plan development last year, especially with regard to CE and other worldwide market certification planning. This also included electronic product pre-auditing for compliance to safety standards.

I’m also grateful for the collaborative partnerships I have with NVLAP and A2LA certified test labs and PCB design and fabrication houses. I’m especially grateful to Gordon Helm at AHD, located in Southwest Michigan, for continuing to utilize me as his NVLAP ISO 17025 Quality Manager. I’m also grateful to Russ Martin and Jeff Woods at ACS Test Labs in Buford Georgia, and David Schramm at SGS in Suwanee, Georgia for the resources, referrals, and overall support.

I hope that the economy continues to improve and we all enjoy a healthy and successful year in 2015. Please remember Sunrise Electronic Innovations for your EMC Compliance planning, design, prescreen, and trouble shooting needs.

Take Care,

Dave Miller, NCE
Sunrise Electronic Innovations LLC
678-358-8775
dave@emcdesigner.com

Why Electronic Products Produce EMI Part 1

Electronic designers may avoid considering electromagnetic compatibility because their exposure to electromagnetic field theory was so mathematically intensive. While mathematical models are important, focusing on the math can distract a person from appreciating the practical aspects of how electromagnetic fields behave.

In my experience, the easiest way to understand EMI is to think of water. Water seeks the path of least resistance, and water wants to return to its source.

In EM terms, what is a source? Any place where current originates. A buffer, a power supply, a driver, or even a bypass capacitor, an inductor, or ferrite bead can be thought of as a current source.

Unlike water, when electrical current flows, it generates an electromagnetic field. And the EM field that current generates in turn influences the path along which the current flows.

Ideally, in electronic circuits, all return currents follow paths back to their sources that match the paths that the currents originate from. Consider the diagram below:

figure1Figure 1: Optimal Current Paths

The arrows indicate both primary current flow paths and return current flow paths through ground. When return current flows along a path that matches the source path, the EM fields generated by the current flow cancel each other, and the circuit does not create Electromagnetic interference. Another way to look at it is that all the current energy stays within the intended pathways.

Like water, electric current energy follows the most efficient path back to its source. If the intended pathway is not the most efficient route for return current to follow, the electric fields generated by the forward and return currents will choose a more efficient path, and emissions will result.

Now consider the figure below, which illustrates a problematic return path in the buffer circuit described above:

figure2

Figure 2: Problematic Current Paths

Notice in figure 2 how the most efficient return path for the current being sourced by the buffer is no longer the short path back to the buffer, but rather a long looped path through earth or chassis ground and the mains power source.  When tested for emissions, the above illustration may produce either conducted or radiated emissions, depending on the frequency characteristics of the buffer sourced current.

Why would electrical energy choose a long path rather than the intended short path? This is where a little math may be required, or at least an understanding of what the math predicts. One reason might be that the longer path happens to match a resonant wavelength of some harmonic frequency of the alternating buffer current. Another reason might be that the intended return path presents a high impedance at the offending frequency and actually blocks the return current. Mismatch between the buffer circuit source, path, and destination impedances can be a factor as well, causing undesirable reflections in the buffer sourced current.

Whatever the cause for the undesirable emissions, understanding the behaviors of electromagnetic fields can help a designer to “design out” potential EMC issues prior to testing. Looking at a design as a series of current sources that require adequate return paths can assist in this understanding.

Part of our job at Sunrise Electronic Innovations includes educating our customers while doing design reviews and product pre-screen testing. As we educate our customers, their designs improve to the point that little to no modification is required for passing certification testing. To gain the benefit of our experience, please give us a call at 678-358-8775.